The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance

Maykel Verkuyten*, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Levi Adelman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Living with cultural, religious, and ideological diversity inevitably creates situations where people are confronted with beliefs, values, or practices that they disapprove of. In such situations, people may consider reasons to nevertheless tolerate what they disapprove of (i.e., forbearance tolerance), or reject these (i.e., intolerance). In the current review, we consider empirical research on the processes of intergroup tolerance and consider different manifestations of (in)tolerance. Then we discuss recent work on the dual process model of tolerance, which considers intuitive versus deliberative objections to cultural, religious, and ideological differences, and how these can be overridden to produce tolerance. We then review literature on the boundaries of tolerance including the role of moralization and moral values, before considering individual difference factors and situations of threat that can hamper intergroup tolerance. We conclude by considering five areas ripe for future exploration on the social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-43
Number of pages43
JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date13 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This contribution was supported by a European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 740788; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Diversity
  • Intergroup Relations
  • Intolerance
  • Tolerance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this