Abstract
Women with dependent children have repeatedly been shown to be more likely to be self-employed than other women. The mumpreneurship thesis explains this motherhood effect as a preference-based strategy to meet both good worker and good mother norms. The disadvantaged worker thesis argues that mothers in weak labour market positions are pushed into self-employment because of work–family conflict. Exploring patterns of motherhood effects across 23 high- and middle-income countries, I argue that the mumpreneurship and disadvantaged worker theses should not be considered as conflicting hypotheses, but rather as addressing separate social position groups. I identify four clusters of countries where either one, both or neither of the two hypotheses can be confirmed. Country-level analyses indicate that more negative attitudes towards housewives are associated with larger motherhood premiums for women in high social positions, whereas higher enrolment and smaller classes in pre-primary education increase the motherhood premium for all groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1285-1307 |
| Journal | Gender, Work and Organization |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 13 Nov 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- childcare
- labour market inequality
- motherhood
- self-employment
- work–family conflict