Abstract
Critical voices on unfairly high mpox and other vaccine prices open the debate on the € right price' to be paid to private vaccine suppliers. We apply compound real options analysis as a more appropriate valuation method to derive a correct firm's break-even price. Real option models are better able to capture the development costs, associated risks and the embedded operational flexibility in vaccine development in a superior way compared with more traditional net present value (NPV) methods. The real option price is lower than standard NPV-based methods, thereby providing a basis to improve the bargaining position of payers in negotiating better vaccine price outcomes. Deeper insights into the correct break-even price will create a more balanced playing field between firms and payers. This can also lead to more equitable access to vaccines in developing countries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e018390 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | BMJ Global Health |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 May 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Decision Making
- Global Health
- Health economics
- Interdisciplinary Research
- Vaccines
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of the right valuation method in setting the firm's break-even price for mpox (and other) vaccines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver