Abstract
The current hot debate on biofuels calls for a balanced and realistic long-term strategy for
biofuels. The REFUEL project provides several ingredients for such a strategy. Analyses in
this project indicate that domestically produced biofuels can cover a significant share of EU
fuel demand in the coming decades, with the EU-12 new member states and Ukraine as
most promising regions. This potential can be realised with residual streams and on
existing agricultural land, without conversion of e.g. nature reserves. Second generation
biofuels are essential for the long-term success of biofuels due to their superior performance
in many ways. But generally, the key challenge for the near future would be how to
enhance the development of biofuels in a responsible way, i.e. stimulating the production
chains with the best performance, and preventing negative impacts e.g., by paying careful
attention to possible system impacts of biofuel production such as indirect land use
changes and rising food prices. Finally, 2nd generation biofuels require specific policy: the
precursor role of 1st generation is overrated, both in technical terms as well as in their role
as market precursors. When it comes to synergies, 2nd generation biofuels might benefit
more from other developments in the energy sector, such as initiatives in co-firing of
biomass for (heat and) power, than from 1st generation biofuels, also because of the public
resistance that the latter induce.
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 244-250 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Biomass and Bioenergy |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |