Abstract
In the work described in this thesis, the central focus has been on the influence
of proline amino acids on protein structure, protein regulation and its place in
proteomics experiments.
In Chapter 2, we will evaluate how different PTMs can influence the placement
or removal of other PTMs. We discuss the different mechanisms possible for
both positive and negative interplay and look at some well-known examples
when available. Most of this chapter is aimed at the interplay between O-GlcNac
and phosphorylation, an interesting situation since both modifications occur on
serine and threonine residues. Due to its enrichment near serine and threonine
phosphorylation sites, proline is also involved and its role is briefly discussed.
In Chapter 3, we focus on the potential benefit of using proline residues as
a cleavage site in proteomics. Since trypsin does not cleave when arginine
or lysine are followed by a proline, the peptides resulting from cleavage at
proline are expected to be highly complementary to the much more commonly
analyzed tryptic peptides. In this chapter we touch upon some of the limitations
of trypsin, the benefits of using alternative proteases and we compare the
peptides and proteins found with either trypsin or EndoPro, the proline specific
protease we explored.
We focus more on the characteristics of proline in Chapter 4. Since it can
stably exist in both cis and trans isomers, proline adds an interesting, dynamic
dimension to protein structure and the resulting protein biology. In this chapter
we employ a bioinformatics approach to evaluate the abundance of cis/trans
isomers of proline in protein structures and we investigate the proline-specific
protease EndoPro for its isomer specificity.
24
In Chapter 5, we studied the full-length protein Pin1, the enzyme catalyzing
the cis/trans isomerization of proline residues when they are directly adjacent
to a phosphorylated serine or threonine residues. Following its expression
and purification, we employed affinity based pull-down methods aimed to
distinguish between different interactors of Pin1. We were able to purify and
detect many known and novel Pin1 interactors, but still need further validation
of the interactions and their functional relevance.
Finally, in Chapter 6, I close with a personal view on typical choices in
proteomics workflows and how these may be suboptimal when interested in
certain aspects of the proteome. My main point here is that we should always
be aware of the choices we make and how these might affect the outcome of
our experiments.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Qualification | Doctor of Philosophy |
Awarding Institution |
|
Supervisors/Advisors |
|
Award date | 13 Apr 2022 |
Place of Publication | Utrecht |
Publisher | |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 13 Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- proteomics
- proline
- isomerization
- PTMs
- mass spectrometry
- MS
- HRAM