The Ottoman Imperial Gaze: The Greek Revolution of 1821–1832 and a New History of the Eastern Question

Ozan Ozavci*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This article traces what hindsight shows to be the failure paths of the Ottoman ruling elites in dealing with the Greek revolution of 1821–1832. It considers why Sultan Mahmud II and the Ottoman ministers were unable to quell the ‘insurgence’ definitively and fend off Great Power intervention diplomatically. To this end, it looks into the reaction of the Ottoman rulers to the adversity as well as rivalries among the pashas of the sultan, which strained the imperial front, heightened violence against the insurgents, and then tore apart the military campaign. At the same time, it seeks to re-instate in the historiography of the Eastern Question the much-neglected Ottoman positionality with a contrapuntal approach. It places the agency of European and Ottoman actors within the same analytical frame in its discussion of the Great Power intervention in 1827, disclosing why the Ottoman ministers rejected the European Powers’ proposals to mediate between the imperial authorities and the Greek revolutionaries. Consulting fresh archival and secondary sources in the Arabic, English, French, Russian, Ottoman, and modern Turkish languages, the article draws attention to several overlooked yet vital moments of the revolution's storyline.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)222-237
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Modern European History
    Volume21
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s) 2023.

    Keywords

    • imperial gaze
    • Navarino
    • The Eastern Question
    • the great powers
    • the Greek revolution
    • the Ottoman empire

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Ottoman Imperial Gaze: The Greek Revolution of 1821–1832 and a New History of the Eastern Question'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this