Abstract
The societal inability to respond accurately to the ecological crisis also requires a reflection on how universities can improve the impact of their practices. This paper reports on a prize-winning experiment aiming to strengthen the interaction of the university with the world of policymaking: a mixed classroom with students and policymakers. This classroom provides an environment in which policymakers and students co-produce insights, while giving policymakers direct access to academic knowledge and helping students to reflect on the dynamics of real-world contexts. The main goal of this study is to illuminate how learning in and through a mixed classroom experiment take places, for participants, teachers and organisational actors. To do so, we reflect on the continuous dialogue between our efforts as teachers and the experience of participants and others involved. To make sense of our teaching and institutional roles in this experiment, we suggest using the concept of ‘tinkering’. Further, to conceptualise the learning dynamics in a mixed classroom, we deploy the concept of ‘boundary crossing’, which turns out to be helpful in elucidating both individual learning (‘reflection’) and organisational learning (‘transformation’). Our study indicates that the notion of boundary crossing helps to effectively capture the learning situation we created and, as such, helps to redefine more generally how the science-policy interface can be understood and acted upon. For other educators interested in deploying mixed classroom-like approaches, we suggest that a tinkering approach can only work if there is sufficient room for experimentation, including failure and reflection, as well as ample time and funding. We also suggest critically looking at the constraints of the institutional logics and dynamics of higher education (e.g. the structure of semesters) and how their connection to the institutional logics and temporal dynamics of real-world contexts may be improved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 669 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 24 May 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Funding
We thank all the participants and fellow lecturers in the first six editions of the mixed classroom for their experimental mindset and valuable insights. We would like to thank the Urban Futures Studio team for their feedback on early versions of this article. Peter Pelzer would like to thank Johannes Stripple and colleagues for kindly hosting him at Lund University to discuss and work on this paper. This stay in Lund was made possible by the Ronald van Kempen Urban Geography Fund. The mixed classroom experiment was funded by the Dutch Ministries of Infrastructure and Waterworks and the of Interior Affairs and Kingdom Relations. The research time of the first two authors to reflect on the mixed classroom experiment and conceptualize this article was made possible by the Higher Education Premium 2021 awarded by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Ronald van Kempen Urban Geography Fund - Dutch Ministries of Infrastructure and Waterworks and the of Interior Affairs and Kingdom Relations | |
Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science |