Abstract
In this paper, we examine whether social class and class divides in social networks contribute to individuals' attachment to society. We argue that network segregation restricts individuals' social worlds, thereby diminishing societal attachment. Our research site is Chile, a country with relatively low social cohesion and one of the world's highest levels of economic inequality. We use large-scale representative survey data collected in 2016 for the Chilean urban population aged 18–75 years (n = 2983) and interrelate indicators of well-established dimensions and sub-dimensions of societal attachment. Results of our regression analyses show that members of the upper middle class are more attached to society than their fellow citizens from other social strata. In addition, having more social contacts within one's own social class reduces attachment to society. In particular, network homogeneity lessens societal attachment for lower- and upper-class individuals, but not so strongly in the middle class. We conclude that social cohesion in Chilean society would be enhanced not only by more equal opportunities but also by changes to the social settings in which social class segregation is (re)produced.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 754-785 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | British Journal of Sociology |
Volume | 73 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 19 Jul 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:We are grateful for support from the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies—COES. In addition, we would like to thank three anonymous referees for their constructive and critical suggestions that significantly added value to the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.
Funding
We are grateful for support from the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies—COES. In addition, we would like to thank three anonymous referees for their constructive and critical suggestions that significantly added value to the paper.
Keywords
- homophily
- inequality
- network homogeneity
- social class
- social cohesion