Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry

  • Nitish Govindarajan
  • , Georg Kastlunger
  • , Joseph A. Gauthier
  • , Jun Cheng
  • , Ivo Filot
  • , Arthur Hagopian
  • , Heine Anton Hansen
  • , Jun Huang
  • , Piotr M. Kowalski
  • , Jinwen Liu
  • , Juan M. Lombardi
  • , Mikael Maraschin
  • , Andrew Peterson
  • , Hemanth S. Pillai
  • , Hector Prats
  • , Conor J. Price
  • , Rene van Roij
  • , Jan Rossmeisl
  • , Ranga Rohit Seemakurthi
  • , Seung-Jae Shin
  • Audrey Smith, Jia-Xin Zhu, Katharina Doblhoff-Dier
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Texas Tech University System
  • Xiamen University
  • Eindhoven University of Technology
  • Leiden University - Excl LUMC
  • Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association
  • Semiconductor Laboratory Of The Max Planck Society
  • Brown University
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology
  • Ulsan National Institute of Science & Technology (UNIST)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Computational electrochemistry is hard-anybody who has ever tried will know. We argue that the reasons for its complexity lie not only in the multiscale nature of electrochemical processes but also in the rapid, ongoing method development in the field. This has resulted in a lack of clear guidelines and many open discussions in the community. These issues were also the topic of a recent Lorentz Center workshop, the key take-away messages of which are highlighted in this Perspective. In particular, we discuss why the choice between constant potential and constant charge simulations is less trivial than it may seem, why interpreting electrochemical reaction free energy diagrams can be challenging, why the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equation is not all there is, and why we desperately need more benchmarking in the field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4277–4288
Number of pages12
JournalACS Energy Letters
Volume10
Issue number9
Early online date8 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Keywords

  • Activation
  • Co2
  • Dependence
  • Dissolution
  • Evolution
  • Insights
  • Oxygen reduction
  • Proton discharge
  • Simulation
  • Understand

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this