Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101599 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
Volume | 25 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors
Funding
We conducted semi-structured interviews (Bernard, 2006; Leech, 2002) with a select group of policy makers with experience working with HBSC data to triangulate findings from the reviews of evidence and to begin to understand the role and strategic use of the FAS in the policy world. We used a short introduction and a set of prompt questions to stimulate discussion with participants about their organizational experience with using HBSC data on FAS-related health inequalities (see Appendix 1). We interviewed four policy makers at international agencies that work with data on children and adolescent health (Baker & Edwards, 2012). We approached one participant at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), one participant at the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF), and two participants at the World Health Organisation (WHO). These three international agencies were utilising many data sources for their strategic work and had collaborated with the HBSC Study in relation to the use of its data. This qualitative work gave a snapshot on the views of policy makers and provides the basis for more detailed, systematic and wide-ranging work in the future to understand the impact of FAS in policy work.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund | |
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap |
Keywords
- Adolescent health
- Family affluence scale (FAS)
- Family material deprivation
- Global health indicators
- HBSC study
- Indicator development
- Policy impact
- Socioeconomic inequalities