The International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes: initial results

  • J.D. Parker
  • , D.Q. Rich
  • , S. Glinianaia
  • , J.H. Leem
  • , D. Wartenberg
  • , M.L. Bell
  • , M. Bonzini
  • , M. Brauer
  • , L. Darrow
  • , U. Gehring
  • , N. Gouveia
  • , P. Grillo
  • , E. Ha
  • , E.H. van den Hooven
  • , B. Jalaludin
  • , B.M. Jesdale
  • , J. Lepeule
  • , R. Morello-Frosch
  • , G.G. Morgan
  • , R. Slama
  • F.H. Pierik, A.C. Pesatori, S. Sathyanarayana, J. Seo, M. Strickland, L. Tamburic, T.J. Woodruff

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The findings of prior studies of air pollution effects on adverse birth outcomes are difficult to synthesize because of differences in study design. OBJECTIVES: The International Collaboration on Air Pollution and Pregnancy Outcomes was formed to understand how differences in research methods contribute to variations in findings. We initiated a feasibility study to a) assess the ability of geographically diverse research groups to analyze their data sets using a common protocol and b) perform location-specific analyses of air pollution effects on birth weight using a standardized statistical approach. METHODS: Fourteen research groups from nine countries participated. We developed a protocol to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the association between particulate matter = 10 µm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) and low birth weight (LBW) among term births, adjusted first for socioeconomic status (SES) and second for additional location-specific variables. RESULTS: Among locations with data for the PM10 analysis, ORs estimating the relative risk of term LBW associated with a 10-µg/m³ increase in average PM10 concentration during pregnancy, adjusted for SES, ranged from 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.30-1.35] for the Netherlands to 1.15 (95% CI, 0.61-2.18) for Vancouver, with six research groups reporting statistically significant adverse associations. We found evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity in estimated effects among locations. CONCLUSIONS: Variability in PM10-LBW relationships among study locations remained despite use of a common statistical approach. A more detailed meta-analysis and use of more complex protocols for future analysis may uncover reasons for heterogeneity across locations. However, our findings confirm the potential for a diverse group of researchers to analyze their data in a standardized way to improve understanding of air pollution effects on birth outcomes.
    Original languageUndefined/Unknown
    Pages (from-to)1023-1028
    Number of pages6
    JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
    Volume119
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Cite this