Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief

  • L.I.M. Lenferink
  • , P.A. Boelen
  • , G.E. Smid
  • , Muirne C S Paap
  • Arq Psychotrauma Expert Groep
  • University of Humanistic Studies
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • University of Groningen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Five diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief are currently used in research. Studies evaluating their performance indicate that it is not justified to generalise findings regarding prevalence rates and predictive validity across studies using different diagnostic criteria of pathological grief. We provide recommendations to move the bereavement field forward.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473 - 476
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume219
Issue number3
Early online date13 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • DSM-5
  • ICD-11
  • Persistent complex bereavement disorder
  • complicated grief
  • prolonged grief disorder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this