The impact of argument strength in health communication

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Argument strength plays an important role in the formation of stable attitudes
that are predictive of related behavior. Fortunately, arguments that meet normative
criteria for argument strength are in actuality more convincing than arguments
that meet such criteria to a lesser degree. However, these differences in persuasiveness are relatively small, and will only occur if the audience is paying attention to the arguments. And even then, the role of argument strength may be limited. Health communication often focuses on behavior related to food and exercise, which are strongly intertwined with emotionally loaded issues such as pleasure and beauty, and relate to culturally relevant practices. Such issues are prone to elicit a myside bias in the audience. As a result, people may aim to dismantle (strong) arguments that go against their opinions while boosting the (weak) arguments that are accordance with their preferences. Understanding how people can be motivated to unbiasedly evaluate a message’s arguments, will be important to improve health communication’s impact.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHealth, media, and communication
EditorsGert-Jan De Bruijn, Heidi Vandebosch
PublisherDe Gruyter
Chapter11
Pages213-229
ISBN (Electronic)9783110775426
ISBN (Print)9783110775259
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Publication series

NameHandbooks of Communication Science
PublisherDe Gruyter
Volume15
ISSN (Print)2199-6288
ISSN (Electronic)2199-627X

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of argument strength in health communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this