Abstract
The identifiability of model parameters of a steady state water quality
model of the Biebrza River and the resulting variation in model results
was examined by applying the Monte Carlo method which combines
calibration, identifiability analysis, uncertainty analysis, and
sensitivity analysis. The water quality model simulates the steady state
concentration profiles of chloride, phosphate, ammonium, and nitrate as
a function of distance along a river. The water quality model with the
best combination of parameter values simulates the observed
concentrations very well. However, the range of possible modelled
concentrations obtained for other more or less equally eligible
combinations of parameter values is rather wide. This range in model
outcomes reflects possible errors in the model parameters. Discrepancies
between the range in model outcomes and the validation data set are only
caused by errors in model structure, or (measurement) errors in boundary
conditions or input variables. In this sense the validation procedure is
a test of model capability, where the effects of calibration errors are
filtered out. It is concluded that, despite some slight deviations
between model outcome and observations, the model is successful in
simulating the spatial pattern of nutrient concentrations in the Biebrza
River.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-322 |
Journal | Journal of Hydrology |
Volume | 200 |
Issue number | 1-4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 1997 |
Keywords
- Water quality model
- Steady state
- Concentration profile
- Monte Carlo method
- Calibration errors