Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Genomic Makeup of Nine Horse Populations Sampled in the Netherlands

  • Anouk Schurink
  • , Merina Shrestha
  • , Susanne Eriksson
  • , Mirte Bosse
  • , Henk Bovenhuis
  • , Willem Back
  • , Anna M Johansson
  • , Bart J Ducro
    • Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. [email protected].
    • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. [email protected].
    • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. [email protected].
    • Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. [email protected].
    • Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. [email protected].
    • Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7023, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden. [email protected].
    • Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. [email protected].

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The spectrum of modern horse populations encompasses populations with a long history of development in isolation and relatively recently formed types. To increase our understanding of the evolutionary history and provide information on how to optimally conserve or improve these populations with varying development and background for the future, we analyzed genotype data of 184 horses from 9 Dutch or common horse populations in the Netherlands: The Belgian draft horse, Friesian horse, Shetland pony, Icelandic horse, Gelder horse, Groninger horse, harness horse, KWPN sport horse and the Lipizzaner horse population. Various parameters were estimated (e.g., runs of homozygosity and FST values) to gain insight into genetic diversity and relationships within and among these populations. The identified genomic makeup and quantified relationships did mostly conform to the development of these populations as well as past and current breeding practices. In general, populations that allow gene-flow showed less inbreeding and homozygosity. Also, recent bottlenecks (e.g., related to high selective pressure) caused a larger contribution of long ROHs to inbreeding. Maintaining genetic diversity through tailor-made breeding practices is crucial for a healthy continuation of the investigated, mostly inbred and (effectively) small sized horse populations, of which several already experience inbreeding related issues.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number480
    Number of pages27
    JournalGenes
    Volume10
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2019

    Keywords

    • genetic diversity
    • horses
    • inbreeding
    • population structure
    • relatedness
    • runs of homozygosity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Genomic Makeup of Nine Horse Populations Sampled in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this