Abstract
This essay analyses fan reactions to the sexual abuse allegations brought forward against Michael Jackson in Leaving Neverland (Dan Reed, 2019). In particular, it focuses on fans’ production of nonfiction media produced in defense of Jackson, trying to restore the artist’s reputation by discrediting his accusers. Based on textual and content analysis of videos by The Michael Jackson Innocent Project (MJIP) and its wider network, this essay positions these videos within the context of documentaries and nonfiction programs produced on the singer. Arguing that the videos represent a form of “forensic fandom,” the essay maintains that fans stage a “media tribunal” against Jackson’s accusers to defend the singer. Because of their biased argumentation, however, fans reinforce myths about disingenuous allegations of sexual violence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1106-1122 |
| Journal | American Behavioral Scientist |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Media tribunal
- forensic fandom
- Michael Jackson
- YouTube
- sexual abuse
