Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of an intramammary infusion, containing tilmicosin phosphate, to an infusion of a negative control intramammary placebo for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period. Cows were enrolled from 24 dairy herds from three geographical regions of Canada. Data from 248 cows and 938 bacteriologically negative quarters at drying-off are summarized. Overall, the rate of new IMI during the dry period was 16.7% of quarters. The new infection rates for quarters that received intramammary tilmicosin compared with the intramammary placebo were 14.4 and 19.4%, respectively. The majority of new IMI was caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (49%) and environmental streptococcal organisms (26.8%). The probability for quarters to develop new IMI in the dry period was significantly increased when cows had higher milk production before drying-off (P = 0.04), when cows had longer dry periods (P = 0.02), and when dry cows were housed in tie-stall barns (P = 0.002). Higher parity cows and those that had a linear score somatic cell count (SCC) above 4 on the last DHI test were also at increased risk for new IMI (P < 0.10). Administration of intramammary tilmicosin appears to be an efficacious therapy for prevention of new IMI; however, there is currently no approved intramammary formulation of this product available. Use of blanket dry cow antibiotic therapy compared to selective dry cow therapy, as well as the importance of identifying risk factors and managing the environment of dry cows are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3250-3259 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Dairy Science |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2002 |
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of the research technicians at each site: Jeromy TenHag, Theresa Rogers, Isabelle Dutil, Angela Fairfield, and Alana McNicholl. Thanks to the producers who participated in the study. Drs. Guy Archambault, Jamie Hobson, and Jean Moreau contributed herds from their veterinary practices. A special thanks to Gord Vessie for his organization of trial supplies and monitoring and to Anna Bashiri and the staff at the Mastitis Research Laboratory. This study was supported financially by Provel (Division of Eli Lilly Inc., Canada), the Dairy Farmers of Ontario , and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture , Food, and Rural Affairs.
Keywords
- Dry period
- Mastitis
- Risk factor
- Tilmicosin