The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) II: Temporal Factors Related to Diesel Exhaust Exposure and Lung Cancer Mortality in the Nested Case-Control Study

  • Debra T Silverman*
  • , Bryan A Bassig
  • , Jay Lubin
  • , Barry Graubard
  • , Aaron Blair
  • , Roel Vermeulen
  • , Michael Attfield
  • , Nathan Appel
  • , Nathaniel Rothman
  • , Patricia Stewart
  • , Stella Koutros
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) was an important contributor to the International Agency for Research on Cancer reclassification of diesel exhaust as a Group I carcinogen and subsequent risk assessment. We extended the DEMS cohort follow-up by 18 y and the nested case– control study to include all newly identified lung cancer deaths and matched controls (DEMS II), nearly doubling the number of lung cancer deaths. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to characterize the exposure–response relationship with a focus on the effects of timing of exposure and exposure cessation. METHODS: We conducted a case–control study of lung cancer nested in a cohort of 12,315 workers in eight nonmetal mines (376 lung cancer deaths, 718 controls). Controls were selected from workers who were alive when the case died, individually matched on mine, sex, race/ethnicity, and birth year (within 5 y). Based on an extensive historical exposure assessment, we estimated respirable elemental carbon (REC), an index of diesel exposure, for each cohort member. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated by conditional regression analyses controlling for smoking and other confounders. To evaluate time windows of exposure, we evaluated the joint OR patterns for cumulative REC within each of four preselected exposure time windows, <5, 5–9, 10–19, and ≥20 y prior to death/reference date, and we evaluated the interaction of cumulative exposure across time windows under additive and multiplicative forms for the joint association. RESULTS: ORs increased with increasing 15-y lagged cumulative exposure, peaking with a tripling of risk for exposures of ∼ 950 to <1,700 lg/m3-y [OR = 3:23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47, 7.10], followed by a plateau/decline among the heavily exposed (OR = 1:85; 95% CI: 0.85, 4.04). Patterns of risk by cumulative REC exposure varied across four exposure time windows (phomogeneity < 0:001), with ORs increasing for exposures accrued primarily 10–19 y prior to death (ptrend < 0:001). Results provided little support for a waning of risk among workers whose exposures ceased for ≥20 y. CONCLUSION: DEMS II findings provide insight into the exposure–response relationship between diesel exhaust and lung cancer mortality. The pro-nounced effect of exposures occurring in the window 10–19 y prior to death, the sustained risk 20 or more years after exposure ceases, and the pla-teau/decline in risk among the most heavily exposed provide direction for future research on the mechanism of diesel-induced carcinogenesis in addition to having important implications for the assessment of risk from diesel exhaust by regulatory agencies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number087002
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume131
Issue number8
Early online date7 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services. All rights reserved.

Funding

This research was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, NCI, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Occupational Exposure/analysis
  • Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity
  • Vehicle Emissions/toxicity
  • Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study (DEMS) II: Temporal Factors Related to Diesel Exhaust Exposure and Lung Cancer Mortality in the Nested Case-Control Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this