The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence

Piia Seppala, Saija Mauno, Taru Feldt, Jari Hakanen, Ulla Kinnunen, Asko Tolvanen, Wilmar Schaufeli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the factor structure and factorial group and time invariance of the 17-item and 9-item versions of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; Schaufeli et al. (2002b) Journal of Happiness Studies 3:71-92). Furthermore, the study explored the rank-order stability of work engagement. The data were drawn from five different studies (N = 9,404), including a three-year longitudinal study (n = 2,555), utilizing five divergent occupational samples. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized correlated three-factor structure-vigor, dedication, absorption-of both UWES scales. However, while the structure of the UWES-17 did not remain the same across the samples and time, the structure of the UWES-9 remained relatively unchanged. Thus, the UWES-9 has good construct validity and use of the 9-item version can be recommended in future research. Moreover, as hypothesized, Structural Equation Modeling showed high rank-order stabilities for the work engagement factors (between 0.82 and 0.86). Accordingly, work engagement seems to be a highly stable indicator of occupational well-being.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-481
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Happiness Studies
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Factor structure
  • Factorial group and time invariance
  • Rank-order stability
  • Utrecht Work Engagement Scale
  • Work engagement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this