The challenges of livelihoods reconstruction in the context of informal settlement upgrading

Pauline C. Cherunya*, Bernhard Truffer, Edinah Moraa Samuel, Christoph Lüthi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Community involvement is recognized as a core condition for success in informal settlements upgrading. However, the wider ramifications of this requirement are not well understood. Mostly, community involvement has been equated with a narrow interpretation of participation, largely focusing on the elicitation of dwellers’ preferences at the planning stages. We argue that this approach overlooks the actual needs for livelihoods reconstruction in the course of upgrading. To better conceptualize these requirements, we propose to analyse the time–space configuration of practices, which we frame as constituting Oscillating Domestic Spaces. The concept illustrates the contingent nature of daily activities to meet livelihoods needs and how people navigate these conditions. Challenges associated with reconstructing new domestic spaces are illustrated using the Kenyan Slum Upgrading (Kensup) initiative in Nairobi, Kenya. The findings suggest that an inadequate understanding and consideration of livelihoods reconstruction reduced legitimacy of the initiative, resulted in rapid deterioration of physical amenities and relegated most of the alleged ‘beneficiaries’ deeper into poverty. We suggest that, for successful settlements upgrading, livelihoods reconstruction should be a core process in the planning, implementation and post-implementation stages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-190
Number of pages23
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume53
Issue number1
Early online date2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Informal settlement upgrading
  • livelihoods reconstruction
  • Oscillating Domestic Space
  • participation
  • relocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The challenges of livelihoods reconstruction in the context of informal settlement upgrading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this