The "Big Two" in Hiring Discrimination: Evidence From a Cross-National Field Experiment

Susanne Veit, Hannah Arnu, Valentina Di Stasio, Ruta Yemane, Marcel Coenders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We tested whether signaling warmth and competence (“Big Two”) in job applications increases hiring chances. Drawing on a field experimental data from five European countries, we analyzed the responses of employers (N = 13,162) to applications from fictitious candidates of different origin: native candidates and candidates of European, Asian, or Middle-Eastern/African descent. We found that competence signals slightly increased invitation rates, while warmth signals had no effect. We also found ethnic discrimination, a female premium, and differences in callbacks depending on job characteristics. Importantly, however, providing stereotype signals did not reduce the level of ethnic discrimination or the female premium. Likewise, we found little evidence for interactions between stereotype signals and job demands. While speaking against the importance of “Big Two” signals in application documents, our results highlight the importance of group membership and hopefully stimulate further research on the role of in particular ethnic stereotypes for discrimination in hiring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167–182
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume48
Issue number2
Early online date6 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Keywords

  • ethnic minorities
  • field experiment
  • hiring discrimination
  • stereotypes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The "Big Two" in Hiring Discrimination: Evidence From a Cross-National Field Experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this