The Association Between Male Circumcision and Condom Use Behavior - a Meta-Analysis

Steven Ndugwa Kabwama; Derrick Ssewanyana; Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff

doi:10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66

The Association Between Male Circumcision and Condom Use Behavior - a Meta-Analysis

Steven Ndugwa Kabwama, Derrick Ssewanyana, Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The protective benefit of male circumcision against spreading HIV is well established.

Aim: The objective of this Meta-analysis was to investigate behavioral risk compensation measured as the change in condom use behavior in light of knowledge of the benefits of circumcision.

Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 6 bibliographic databases for studies that quantitatively assessed a link between male circumcision and condom use behavior. Pooled odd ratios (OR) of condom use during any sexual activity were generated from three cohort studies and two Randomized Control Trails (RCT) that were included in the review.

Results: The pooled effects from cohort and RCTs were not statistically significant at 6 months follow-up (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.57-1.45), at 12 months (OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.87-1.34) and 24 or more months (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.45).

Conclusion: Male circumcision does not influence condom use behavior in the medium and short term.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	62-66
Number of pages	5
Journal	Materia Socio-Medica
Volume	30
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66
Publication status	Published - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66

kabwamaFinal published version, 766 KB

Cite this

@article{e830548896ab4e768e03f9837167fee1,

title = "The Association Between Male Circumcision and Condom Use Behavior - a Meta-Analysis",

abstract = "Introduction: The protective benefit of male circumcision against spreading HIV is well established.Aim: The objective of this Meta-analysis was to investigate behavioral risk compensation measured as the change in condom use behavior in light of knowledge of the benefits of circumcision.Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 6 bibliographic databases for studies that quantitatively assessed a link between male circumcision and condom use behavior. Pooled odd ratios (OR) of condom use during any sexual activity were generated from three cohort studies and two Randomized Control Trails (RCT) that were included in the review.Results: The pooled effects from cohort and RCTs were not statistically significant at 6 months follow-up (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.57-1.45), at 12 months (OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.87-1.34) and 24 or more months (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.45).Conclusion: Male circumcision does not influence condom use behavior in the medium and short term.",

author = "Kabwama, {Steven Ndugwa} and Derrick Ssewanyana and Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "62--66",

journal = "Materia Socio-Medica",

issn = "1512-7680",

publisher = "Academy of Medical Sciences in Bosnia and Herzegovina",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Association Between Male Circumcision and Condom Use Behavior - a Meta-Analysis

AU - Kabwama, Steven Ndugwa

AU - Ssewanyana, Derrick

AU - Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Introduction: The protective benefit of male circumcision against spreading HIV is well established.Aim: The objective of this Meta-analysis was to investigate behavioral risk compensation measured as the change in condom use behavior in light of knowledge of the benefits of circumcision.Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 6 bibliographic databases for studies that quantitatively assessed a link between male circumcision and condom use behavior. Pooled odd ratios (OR) of condom use during any sexual activity were generated from three cohort studies and two Randomized Control Trails (RCT) that were included in the review.Results: The pooled effects from cohort and RCTs were not statistically significant at 6 months follow-up (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.57-1.45), at 12 months (OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.87-1.34) and 24 or more months (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.45).Conclusion: Male circumcision does not influence condom use behavior in the medium and short term.

AB - Introduction: The protective benefit of male circumcision against spreading HIV is well established.Aim: The objective of this Meta-analysis was to investigate behavioral risk compensation measured as the change in condom use behavior in light of knowledge of the benefits of circumcision.Material and Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 6 bibliographic databases for studies that quantitatively assessed a link between male circumcision and condom use behavior. Pooled odd ratios (OR) of condom use during any sexual activity were generated from three cohort studies and two Randomized Control Trails (RCT) that were included in the review.Results: The pooled effects from cohort and RCTs were not statistically significant at 6 months follow-up (OR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.57-1.45), at 12 months (OR=1.08, 95% CI=0.87-1.34) and 24 or more months (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.45).Conclusion: Male circumcision does not influence condom use behavior in the medium and short term.

U2 - 10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66

DO - 10.5455/msm.2018.30.62-66

M3 - Article

C2 - 29670480

SN - 1512-7680

VL - 30

SP - 62

EP - 66

JO - Materia Socio-Medica

JF - Materia Socio-Medica

IS - 1

ER -

The Association Between Male Circumcision and Condom Use Behavior - a Meta-Analysis

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this