TY - JOUR
T1 - The anticipatory governance of sustainability transformations: Hybrid approaches and dominant perspectives
AU - Muiderman, Karlijn
AU - Zurek, Monika
AU - Vervoort, Joost
AU - Gupta, Aarti
AU - Hasnain, Saher
AU - Driessen, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is part of the REIMAGINE Project (Re-imagining anticipatory climate governance in the world’s vulnerable regions) funded by the BNP Paribas Foundation under its Climate Initiative, and the Foresight4Food initiative funded by the Open Society Foundation. This work was also implemented as part of the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), which is carried out with support from CGIAR Fund Donors and through bilateral funding agreements. We would like to thank all participants who took part in the survey and the Foresight4Food workshop in Oxford on 27 and 28 February 2020. Karlijn Muiderman would like to thank the Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, for hosting her as a visiting researcher in October 2019 and February 2020, during which ideas for this paper were developed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Anticipation methods and tools are increasingly used to try to imagine and govern transformations towards more sustainable futures across different policy domains and sectors. But there is a lack of research into the steering effects of anticipation on present-day governance choices, especially in the face of urgently needed sustainability transformations. This paper seeks to understand how different perspectives on anticipatory governance connect to attempts to guide policy and action toward transformative change. We analyze perspectives on anticipatory governance in a global network of food system foresight practitioners (Foresight4Food) – using a workshop, interviews, and a survey as our sources of data. We connect frameworks on anticipatory governance and on transformation to analyse different perspectives on the future and their implications for actions in the present to transform food systems and offer new insights for theory and practice. In the global Foresight4Food network, we find that most foresight practitioners use hybrid approaches to anticipatory governance that combine fundamentally different assumptions about the future. We also find that despite these diverse food futures, anticipation processes predominantly produce recommendations that follow more prediction-oriented forms of strategic planning in order to mitigate future risks. We further demonstrate that much anticipation for transformation uses the language on deep uncertainty and deliberative action without fully taking its consequences on board. Thus, opportunities for transforming future food systems are missed due to these implicit assumptions that dominate the anticipatory governance of food systems. Our combined framework helps researchers and practitioners to be more reflexive of how assumptions about key human systems such as food system futures shape what is prioritized/marginalized and included/excluded in actions to transform such systems.
AB - Anticipation methods and tools are increasingly used to try to imagine and govern transformations towards more sustainable futures across different policy domains and sectors. But there is a lack of research into the steering effects of anticipation on present-day governance choices, especially in the face of urgently needed sustainability transformations. This paper seeks to understand how different perspectives on anticipatory governance connect to attempts to guide policy and action toward transformative change. We analyze perspectives on anticipatory governance in a global network of food system foresight practitioners (Foresight4Food) – using a workshop, interviews, and a survey as our sources of data. We connect frameworks on anticipatory governance and on transformation to analyse different perspectives on the future and their implications for actions in the present to transform food systems and offer new insights for theory and practice. In the global Foresight4Food network, we find that most foresight practitioners use hybrid approaches to anticipatory governance that combine fundamentally different assumptions about the future. We also find that despite these diverse food futures, anticipation processes predominantly produce recommendations that follow more prediction-oriented forms of strategic planning in order to mitigate future risks. We further demonstrate that much anticipation for transformation uses the language on deep uncertainty and deliberative action without fully taking its consequences on board. Thus, opportunities for transforming future food systems are missed due to these implicit assumptions that dominate the anticipatory governance of food systems. Our combined framework helps researchers and practitioners to be more reflexive of how assumptions about key human systems such as food system futures shape what is prioritized/marginalized and included/excluded in actions to transform such systems.
KW - Anticipatory governance
KW - Sustainability transformations
KW - Food systems
KW - Politics of the future
KW - Foresight
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122323215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102452
DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102452
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-3780
VL - 73
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Global Environmental Change
JF - Global Environmental Change
M1 - 102452
ER -