The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review

Ruadh Duggan*, Anja Kranjc Horvat, Sascha Schmeling, Erik van Sebille

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Science shows are used in a wide range of settings worldwide to communicate science. Many resources are invested in science shows, however there is little research into what a modern science show is or what it aims to achieve. This systematic review seeks to carve out the landscape of science shows by reviewing their aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes. Using Scopus and Web of Science, we reviewed the English peer-reviewed science show literature over the period 2014–2024. Although thirty-one science performance studies were identified, only five of these referred to a science show, for inclusion in the final analysis. Within these five studies there was great variation in terms of the aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes, hampering intercomparisons. Nevertheless, the review presents a picture of the modern science show as a very versatile form of live performance, which can be tailored to many audiences in a range of different settings. It also highlights the difficulty in drawing conclusions from such a heterogeneous sample, and the need for further research on science shows to support the continued development of this field.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • aims
  • evaluation
  • PRISMA
  • science performance
  • Science show

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The aims, contexts, evaluation and outcomes of science shows: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this