Abstract
In this study, we focus on different strategies drivers use in terms of interleaving between driving and non-driving related tasks (NDRT) while taking back control from automated driving. We conducted two driving simulator experiments to examine how different cognitive demands of texting, priorities, and takeover time budgets affect drivers’ takeover strategies. We also evaluated how different takeover strategies affect takeover performance. We found that the choice of takeover strategy was influenced by the priority and takeover time budget but not by the cognitive demand of the NDRT. The takeover strategy did not have any effect on takeover quality or NDRT engagement but influenced takeover timing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Pages | 13-22 |
Number of pages | 10 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9798400705106 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Sept 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 ACM.
Funding
This work was funded in part by the National Science Foundation under grants CMMI-1840085 and CMMI-1840031.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation | CMMI-1840085, CMMI-1840031 |
Keywords
- automated driving
- interleaving
- non-driving-related task
- takeover