Territorial cohesion, polycentrism and regional disparities: revisiting an unsolved debate

Evert Meijers, Krister Sandberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Cohesion policy in general, and territorial cohesion policy in particular, are aimed at reducing regional imbalances. Polycentric urban development is widely considered a mechanism through which regional disparities would decrease, but the empirical substantiation of that assumption is still largely missing. This chapter explores whether countries that have a more balanced, polycentric urban system have less regional disparities than countries dominated by one or two larger metropolitan areas (hence, monocentric countries). With new, updated measurements of regional disparities and levels of mono-/polycentricity of European countries, we find contrasting findings to our previous study (2008) into this matter. Our evidence points towards polycentric countries being associated with less regional disparities. Also, for North and West Europe we find that countries that are more monocentric witnessed a sharper increase in regional disparities between 2005-2016 than their more polycentric neighbours. We conclude that polycentric urban development may indeed contribute to achieving a more cohesive Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance
Subtitle of host publicationTerritorial, Social and Economic Challenges
EditorsDaniel Rauhut, Franziska Sielker, Alois Humer
Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter11
Pages127-141
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781839103582
ISBN (Print)9781839103575
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2021

Publication series

NameElgar Studies in Planning Theory, Policy and Practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Territorial cohesion, polycentrism and regional disparities: revisiting an unsolved debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this