Abstract
Based on a detailed investigation of the syntax and semantics of two series of person proclitics in Blackfoot (Algonquian: Alberta), we
argue that in addition to traditional K-features, personal pronouns may also contain a temporal component that conditions their distribution
and interpretation. Specifically, we propose that one series of Blackfoot proclitics consists of morphosyntactically simplex pro-KPs that
only encode person features, while the other series are morphosyntactically complex pro-DPs composed of a KP plus a D head. The
semantic contribution of the D head is temporal: it restricts the denotation of the proclitic to a contextually relevant stage of an individual.
We argue that this restriction conditions the distribution of the long forms; they appear in contexts which only involve a temporally
restricted stage of the individual. We discuss three such contexts: inalienable possession, the perfect, and epistemic modality. The short
form proclitics, which lack this temporal restriction, appear in contexts that do not refer to specific stage. Regarding their external syntax,
we argue that the short form proclitics are introduced directly by a lexical head (N or V), whereas the long forms are introduced higher in
the functional structure, by Poss and INFL.
argue that in addition to traditional K-features, personal pronouns may also contain a temporal component that conditions their distribution
and interpretation. Specifically, we propose that one series of Blackfoot proclitics consists of morphosyntactically simplex pro-KPs that
only encode person features, while the other series are morphosyntactically complex pro-DPs composed of a KP plus a D head. The
semantic contribution of the D head is temporal: it restricts the denotation of the proclitic to a contextually relevant stage of an individual.
We argue that this restriction conditions the distribution of the long forms; they appear in contexts which only involve a temporally
restricted stage of the individual. We discuss three such contexts: inalienable possession, the perfect, and epistemic modality. The short
form proclitics, which lack this temporal restriction, appear in contexts that do not refer to specific stage. Regarding their external syntax,
we argue that the short form proclitics are introduced directly by a lexical head (N or V), whereas the long forms are introduced higher in
the functional structure, by Poss and INFL.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 175 |
Number of pages | 199 |
Journal | Lingua |
Issue number | 156 |
Publication status | Published - 31 Jan 2015 |
Keywords
- Pronouns
- Algonquian
- Temporal Stages
- Domain Restriction
- Possessive Constructions
- Perfect