TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally

Clare S Major, Jacob M Paul, Robert A Reeve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Different math indices can be used to assess math potential at school entry. We evaluated whether standardized math achievement (TEMA-2 performance), core number abilities (dot enumeration, symbolic magnitude comparison), non-verbal intelligence (NVIQ) and visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), in combination or separately, predicted mental addition problem solving speed over time. We assessed 267 children's TEMA-2, magnitude comparison, dot enumeration, and VSWM abilities at school entry (5 years) and NVIQ at 8 years. Mental addition problem solving speed was assessed at 6, 8, and 10 years. Longitudinal path analysis supported a model in which dot enumeration performance ability profiles and previous mental addition speed predicted future mental addition speed on all occasions, supporting a componential account of math ability. Standardized math achievement and NVIQ predicted mental addition speed at specific time points, while VSWM and symbolic magnitude comparison did not contribute unique variance to the model. The implications of using standardized math achievement and dot enumeration ability to index math learning potential at school entry are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2263
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TEMA and Dot Enumeration Profiles Predict Mental Addition Problem Solving Speed Longitudinally'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this