Abstract
The article describes the field of sustainability transitions research, which emerged in the past two decades in the context of a growing scientific and public interest in large-scale societal transformation toward sustainability. We describe how different scientific approaches and methodological positions explore diverse types of transitions and provide the basis for multiple theories and models for governance of sustainability transitions. We distinguish three perspectives in studying transitions: socio-technical, socio-institutional, and socio-ecological. Although the field as a whole is very heterogeneous, commonalities can be characterized in notions such as path dependencies, regimes, niches, experiments, and governance. These more generic concepts have been adopted within the analytical perspective of transitions, which has led three different types of approaches to dealing with agency in transitions: analytical, evaluative, and experimental. The field has by now produced a broad theoretical and empirical basis along with a variety of social transformation strategies and instruments, impacting disciplinary scientific fields as well as (policy) practice. In this article, we try to characterize the field by identifying its main perspectives, approaches and shared concepts, and its relevance to real-world sustainability problems and solutions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 599-626 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Annual Review of Environment and Resources |
Volume | 42 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This article was made possible by the support of the ARTS project (http://www. acceleratingtransitions.eu), which is funded by the European Union’s (EU’s) Seventh Frame-work Program (FP7) grant agreement 603654, and the Transformative Social Innovation Theory (TRANSIT) project, which is funded by FP7 grant agreement 613169. The views expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EU. The authors are very grateful for Sarah Rach in assisting with finalizing an earlier version of the article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.
Funding
This article was made possible by the support of the ARTS project (http://www. acceleratingtransitions.eu), which is funded by the European Union’s (EU’s) Seventh Frame-work Program (FP7) grant agreement 603654, and the Transformative Social Innovation Theory (TRANSIT) project, which is funded by FP7 grant agreement 613169. The views expressed in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the EU. The authors are very grateful for Sarah Rach in assisting with finalizing an earlier version of the article.
Keywords
- Sustainability transitions research
- Transdisciplinarity
- Transition governance