Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research

Cathy van Tuijl*, Juliette H Walma van der Molen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Although science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) study paths and STEM work fields may be relatively difficult and therefore not appropriate for everyone, too many children prematurely exclude STEM-related study and work options, based on negative images of the field or negative ability beliefs. In the present article, we provide an overview of the literature from different research perspectives that shows that study choice and career decisions made by young adults have their roots in earlier in childhood. In our view, the literature reviewed points to three interrelated factors that are important in the study choice and career development of children aged 8–16: knowledge, affective value, and ability beliefs and self-efficacy building. Based on this review, we argue that knowledge of the STEM field, and of the self in STEM activities, and parents’ and teachers’ knowledge of the early circumscription processes of children aged 8–16 needs to be broadened. Also, negative and often-stereotypical affective values adhered to STEM study choices or careers among parents and teachers need to be countered. With regard to ability beliefs, we argue that we should focus more attention on turning pupils’ entity beliefs into incremental ones.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)159–183
    Number of pages25
    JournalInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education
    Volume26
    Early online date22 Apr 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2016

    Keywords

    • Career development
    • Childhood
    • STEM
    • Stereotypes
    • Study choice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this