Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin

Leendert van Maanen, Hedderik van Rijn, Jelmer P Borst

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article presents a cognitive model that reconciles a surprising observation in the picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm with the general notion that PWI is a form of Stroop interference. Dell'Acqua, Job, Peressotti, and Pascali (2007) assessed PWI using a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, and concluded that the locus of interference in PWI is during the perceptual encoding stage. Stroop interference, on the other hand, is generally attributed to response selection. Based on these findings it was argued that PWI is not a Stroop effect. The present article discusses an alternative interpretation of these results. We assume that both effects are caused by the same interference mechanism, but that the processing speed associated with the different stimuli (colors vs. words) accounts for the previously reported differences. We support this argument by presenting a single computational model that accounts for both PWI and Stroop phenomena in single task and PRP settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)987-99
Number of pages13
JournalPsychonomic bulletin & review
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Conflict, Psychological
  • Discrimination, Psychological
  • Humans
  • Models, Psychological
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Reaction Time
  • Reading
  • Semantics
  • Stroop Test

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this