Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Strong Gravitational-wave Lensing Posterior Odds

  • Otto A. Hannuksela*
  • , K. Haris
  • , Justin Janquart
  • , Harsh Narola
  • , Hemantakumar Phurailatpam
  • , Jolien D.E. Creighton
  • , Chris Van Den Broeck
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Institute of Technology Calicut
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Royal Observatory of Belgium
  • Nikhef–National Institute for Subatomic Physics
  • Utrecht University
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Like light, gravitational waves are gravitationally lensed by intervening massive astrophysical objects—such as galaxies, clusters, black holes, and stars—resulting in a variety of potentially observable gravitational-wave lensing signatures. Searches for gravitational-wave lensing by the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA collaboration have begun. One common method focuses on strong gravitational-wave lensing, which produces multiple “images”: repeated copies of the same gravitational wave that differ only in amplitude, arrival time, and overall “Morse phase.” The literature identifies two separate approaches to identifying such repeated gravitational-wave events, based on frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Several works have discussed selection effects and identified challenges similar to the well-known “birthday problem”—namely, the rapidly increasing likelihood of false alarms in an ever-growing catalog of event pairs. Here, we discuss these problems, unify the different approaches in Bayesian language, and derive the posterior odds for strong lensing. In particular, the Bayes factor and prior odds are sensitive to the number of gravitational-wave events in the data, but the posterior odds is insensitive to it once strong-lensing time delays are accounted for. We confirm the Lo et al. finding that selection effects enter the Bayes factor as an overall normalization constant. However, this factor cancels out in the posterior odds and does not affect frequentist approaches to strong-lensing detection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume1002
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Keywords

  • Compact objects (288)
  • Galaxies (573)
  • Gravitational lensing (670)
  • Gravitational wave astronomy (675)
  • Gravitational waves (678)
  • Strong gravitational lensing (1643)
  • Transient detection (1957)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strong Gravitational-wave Lensing Posterior Odds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this