Strict enforcement or responsive regulation? How inspector–inspectee interaction and inspectors’ role identity shape decision making

Kim Loyens*, Carina Schott, Trui Steen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In line with a general trend towards more responsive regulation, inspectors are expected to take inspectees’ needs and demands in account when making decisions. At the same time, inspection services increasingly apply instruments aimed at directing the inspectors’ actions. These contradictory signals can make the work of inspectors very difficult. By reviewing relevant literature, this chapter shows that not only inspectees’ behavior and characteristics, but also inspectors’ professional role identity, i.e. the way inspectors view their professional role, is critical to explain and predict decision making on the ground.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages79-94
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9783030040581
ISBN (Print)9783030040574
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Contradictory signals
  • Identity theory
  • Responsive regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strict enforcement or responsive regulation? How inspector–inspectee interaction and inspectors’ role identity shape decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this