Still Accurate to Call It “Campaign-Style”? The Standardization of Campaign-Style Governance in China’s Environmental Management, with the Water Cleanup Project in Huai River Basin as a Case Study

  • Tong Xu*
  • , Yanxin Ma
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines why and how campaign-style governance (CSG) in China's environmental management has undergone a standardization process and identifies the consequences of this standardization. Drawing on the 25-year implementation of the Water Cleanup Project in the Huai River Basin as a case study, we analyze two major revisions undertaken by the Central Government to standardize the application of CSG: the ‘campaign package restrictions’ and the ‘technology-based adjustment’. We find that these revisions have transformed CSG into a hybrid governance, which combines the predictability of conventional governance approaches with the flexibility characteristic of non-conventional governance approaches. This transformation raises important questions about the institutionalization of CSG, particularly regarding the pace, stability, and legitimacy of the institutionalization process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-578
Number of pages18
JournalWater Policy
Volume27
Issue number5
Early online date25 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.

Keywords

  • Campaign-style governance
  • Environmental management
  • Power mode
  • Standardization
  • Technology innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Still Accurate to Call It “Campaign-Style”? The Standardization of Campaign-Style Governance in China’s Environmental Management, with the Water Cleanup Project in Huai River Basin as a Case Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this