Spinozistische begoochelingen

Translated title of the contribution: Spinozistic Delusions

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

W.N.A.Klever’s claim that he has discovered new Spinoza texts is unfounded in every respect. The seventeenth-century manuscript annotations in a copy of Spinoza’s Opera posthuma, kept in Leiden University Library (shelf mark 755 F 32), do not originate in the circle of Spinoza's friends, nor do they contain any material that derives from the philosopher himself. They are an intelligent reader’s comments, and as such they constitute an important document of the immediate reception of Spinoza’s philosophy. So far, the author has not been identified. It was certainly not Spinoza’s correspondent E.W. von Tschirnhaus. and Klever’s attempt to attribute the annotations to Tschirnhaus is a dismal failure: the four arguments adduced to substantiate this claim are altogether spurious.
Translated title of the contributionSpinozistic Delusions
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)107–125
Number of pages19
JournalTijdschrift voor Filosofie
Volume59
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spinozistic Delusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this