Spatial eigenvector filtering for spatiotemporal crime mapping and spatial crime analysis

M Helbich, J Jokar Arsanjani

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Spatial and spatiotemporal analyses are exceedingly relevant to determine criminogenic factors. The estimation of Poisson
    and negative binomial models (NBM) is complicated by spatial autocorrelation. Therefore, first, eigenvector spatial filtering
    (ESF) is introduced as a method for spatiotemporal mapping to uncover time-invariant crime patterns. Second, it is
    demonstrated how ESF is effectively used in criminology to invalidate model misspecification, i.e., residual spatial
    autocorrelation, using a nonviolent crime dataset for the metropolitan area of Houston, Texas, over the period 2005–
    2010. The results suggest that local and regional geography significantly contributes to the explanation of crime patterns.
    Furthermore, common space-time eigenvectors selected on an annual basis indicate striking spatiotemporal patterns
    persisting over time. The findings about the driving forces behind Houston’s crime show that linear and nonlinear, spatially
    filtered, NBMs successfully absorb latent autocorrelation and, therefore, prevent parameter estimation bias. The consideration
    of a spatial filter also increases the explanatory power of the regressions. It is concluded that ESF can be highly
    recommended for the integration in spatial and spatiotemporal modeling toolboxes of law enforcement agencies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to) 134-148
    JournalCartography and Geographic Information Science
    Volume42
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • spatial filtering
    • spatial autocorrelation
    • spatiotemporal crime mapping
    • Poisson regression
    • negative binomial regression
    • generalized additive model

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial eigenvector filtering for spatiotemporal crime mapping and spatial crime analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this