Abstract

Cues that predict the future location of emotional stimuli may evoke an anticipatory form of automatic attentional bias. The reliability of this bias towards threat is uncertain: experimental design may need to be optimized or individual differences may simply be relatively noisy in the general population. The current study therefore aimed to determine the split-half reliability of the bias, in a design with fewer factors and more trials than in previous work. A sample of 63 participants was used for analysis, who performed the cued Visual Probe Task online, which aims to measure an anticipatory attentional bias. The overall bias towards threat was tested and split-half reliability was calculated over even and odd blocks. Results showed a significant bias towards threat and a reliability of around 0.7. The results support systematic individual differences in anticipatory attentional bias and demonstrate that RT-based bias scores, with online data collection, can be reliable.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102930
Number of pages6
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume81
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

Keywords

  • Attentional bias
  • Dot-probe
  • Reliability
  • Cued Visual Probe Task
  • Threat

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial anticipatory attentional bias for threat: Reliable individual differences with RT-based online measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this