'Sometimes they just want to cry for their mum': Couples' negotiations and rationalisations of gendered divisions in infant care

Judy Rose*, Michelle Brady, Mara A. Yerkes, Laetitia Coles

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    This study investigates how couples negotiate and rationalise gendered divisions in infant care. We take a social constructivist approach to analysing qualitative data from 11 couples with infants (aged 6 to 8 months). We find that even where fathers are actively involved in infant care there are strong gendered divisions in the types of care that parents provide. These divisions are rationalised by gendered discourses regarding mother's superior ability to care for and nurture infants and embedded in the 'silences' or taken-for-granted gendered assumptions within couple's accounts. Dominant gendered discourses implicitly defend a father's decision to opt out of infant care tasks they find more difficult, such as soothing an irritable infant. Our study contributes to work and family policy by capturing couples' care negotiations in the early stages of the parent-child relationship. This is a critical time when gendered care patterns are established within families.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)38-56
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Family Studies
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    Keywords

    • Couples
    • Gender
    • Infant care
    • Qualitative
    • Social constructivist
    • Work and family policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of ''Sometimes they just want to cry for their mum': Couples' negotiations and rationalisations of gendered divisions in infant care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this