Abstract
In the last years, remarkable progress has
been made to probe molecular structure of biological systems
using Magic Angle Spinning solid-state NMR (ssNMR). Prominent
examples relate to research areas that have remained challenging
to classical structural biology methods such as membrane
proteins1,2 and protein fibrils (see, e.g., Ref. 3,4,5). In addition, ssNMR
continues to contribute to a structural understanding of basic
biological processes including enzyme catalysis or photosynthesis
and is capable of studying far more complicated heterogeneous
biomolecular systems such as bacterial cell walls6 or inclusion
bodies7,8. Clearly, these advancements would have been impossible
without methodological and instrumental progress in the field of
ssNMR and the pioneering work of Griffin, Opella, Cross, Torchia
and others in the field of biomolecular ssNMR. Yet, a decade ago, it
was still unclear whether one would be able to obtain sequential
assignments of larger proteins, not to mention the determination
of their 3D structures from ssNMR data. Since then, ssNMR progress
has been substantial and improvements in the field of solutionstate
NMR continue to cross fertilize and speed up developments
in solid-state NMR. Finally, the revolutionary developments
in biochemistry and molecular biology in combination with
isotope-labelling, and in more general sense, the ability to design
biomolecular sample preparations for ssNMR studies has played
a critical role. With further increasing molecular size, for example
relating to proteins comprising several hundred amino acids, new
challenges and opportunities lay ahead of us.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of Publication | St. Louis, MO |
Publisher | Sigma-Aldrich |
Number of pages | 12 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |