Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors

Carlijn Bm Kamphuis, Frank J van Lenthe, Katrina Giskes, Martijn Huisman, Johannes Brug, Johan P Mackenbach

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: People with a low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be physically inactive than their higher status counterparts, however, the mechanisms underlying this socioeconomic gradient in physical inactivity remain largely unknown. Our aims were (1) to investigate socioeconomic differences in recreational walking among older adults and (2) to examine to what extent neighbourhood perceptions and individual cognitions regarding regular physical activity can explain these differences.

    METHODS: Data were obtained by a large-scale postal survey among a stratified sample of older adults (age 55-75 years) (N = 1994), residing in 147 neighbourhoods of Eindhoven and surrounding areas, in the Netherlands. Multilevel logistic regression analyses assessed associations between SES (i.e. education and income), perceptions of the social and physical neighbourhood environment, measures of individual cognitions derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (e.g. attitude, perceived behaviour control), and recreational walking for >/=10 minutes/week (no vs. yes).

    RESULTS: Participants in the lowest educational group (OR 1.67 (95% CI, 1.18-2.35)) and lowest income group (OR 1.40 (95% CI, 0.98-2.01)) were more likely to report no recreational walking than their higher status counterparts. The association between SES and recreational walking attenuated when neighbourhood aesthetics was included in the model, and largely reduced when individual cognitions were added to the model (with largest effects of attitude, and intention regarding regular physical activity). The assiation between poor neighbourhood aesthetics and no recreational walking attenuated to (borderline) insignificance when individual cognitions were taken into account.

    CONCLUSION: Both neighbourhood aesthetics and individual cognitions regarding physical activity contributed to the explanation of socioeconomic differences in no recreational walking. Neighbourhood aesthetics may explain the association between SES and recreational walking largely via individual cognitions towards physical activity. Intervention and policy strategies to reduce socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults would be most effective if they intervene on both neighbourhood perceptions as well as individual cognitions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1
    JournalThe International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
    Volume6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Socioeconomic differences in lack of recreational walking among older adults: the role of neighbourhood and individual factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this