Abstract
Social neuroscience is an exciting new field with much to offer to the study of stigma and intergroup relations. In this article, we consider the potential impact that social neuroscience will have for social and public policy pertaining to these important topics. Taking a Hegelian approach, we discuss why social neuroscience should and should not be used by intergroup researchers and policy makers to inform public policy. We then critique these arguments and provide suggestions for best practices. Overall, our assessment of the potential for social neuroscience to inform public policy is positive, but we encourage researchers and policy makers alike to use this new methodology with social responsibility and frugality in mind.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 585-601 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Social Issues |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- STEREOTYPE THREAT
- INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES
- BRAIN POTENTIALS
- NEURAL SIGNALS
- RACIAL BIAS
- RACE BIAS
- PERCEPTION
- PERFORMANCE
- GENDER
- FMRI