TY - JOUR
T1 - Sleep specialists' opinion on sleep disorders and fitness to drive a car
T2 - The necessity of continued education
AU - Mets, Monique A.J.
AU - Alford, Chris
AU - Verster, Joris C.
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - Whether patients with sleep disorders are fit to drive, and who should determine this, is a matter of debate. However, scientific literature is available on these topics to aid clinicians making these decisions. A survey was conducted to assess sleep specialists' views on fitness to drive for patients suffering from apnea, insomnia, and narcolepsy. Most of the 112 respondents (66%, 95%CI: 57-74%) indicated that insomnia patients would be fit to drive within days or weeks after initiating treatment, but 44% (95%CI: 35-53%) felt that, depending on the amount of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), they should not drive if untreated. Around half of respondents (49%, 95%CI: 40-58%) indicated that untreated patients with apnea should not drive, but the majority (66%, 95%CI: 57-74%) felt they could drive after Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment was established, though EDS was a significant factor. For untreated narcoleptic patients 77% (95%CI: 68-84%) indicated they should not drive, and similarly, that treated patients could drive, although EDS levels were again seen as important. It is concluded that patient education remains the most practical approach to improve compliance and reduce accidents associated with EDS. Sleep specialists should remain up-to-date of relevant scientific literature to achieve this goal.
AB - Whether patients with sleep disorders are fit to drive, and who should determine this, is a matter of debate. However, scientific literature is available on these topics to aid clinicians making these decisions. A survey was conducted to assess sleep specialists' views on fitness to drive for patients suffering from apnea, insomnia, and narcolepsy. Most of the 112 respondents (66%, 95%CI: 57-74%) indicated that insomnia patients would be fit to drive within days or weeks after initiating treatment, but 44% (95%CI: 35-53%) felt that, depending on the amount of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), they should not drive if untreated. Around half of respondents (49%, 95%CI: 40-58%) indicated that untreated patients with apnea should not drive, but the majority (66%, 95%CI: 57-74%) felt they could drive after Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment was established, though EDS was a significant factor. For untreated narcoleptic patients 77% (95%CI: 68-84%) indicated they should not drive, and similarly, that treated patients could drive, although EDS levels were again seen as important. It is concluded that patient education remains the most practical approach to improve compliance and reduce accidents associated with EDS. Sleep specialists should remain up-to-date of relevant scientific literature to achieve this goal.
KW - Driving
KW - Excessive daytime sleepiness
KW - Fitness to drive
KW - Insomnia
KW - Narcolepsy
KW - Sleep apnea
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84871831040
U2 - 10.2486/indhealth.2012-0001
DO - 10.2486/indhealth.2012-0001
M3 - Article
C2 - 23047074
AN - SCOPUS:84871831040
SN - 0019-8366
VL - 50
SP - 499
EP - 508
JO - Industrial Health
JF - Industrial Health
IS - 6
ER -