Sick or Sad? A Qualitative Study on How Dutch GPs Deal With Sadness Complaints Among Young Adults

Eva van Dijk, Donald van Tol, Agnes D. Diemers, Albert Wienen, Laura Batstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Feelings of sadness among young adults related to a certain phase of life or to societal factors run the risk of being interpreted as an individual medical problem. Therefore, healthcare professionals should more often widen their perspective and consider demedicalization as being part of their professional responsibility too. This article presents results from a qualitative interview conducted with 13 GPs in different phases of their career to get more insight into the way they deal with complaints of sadness among young adults.
All participants acted proactively but in different ways. Based on the interviews, a typology of three types of general practitioners has been created: the fast referrer, the expert, and the societal GP. There seems to be a paradox in the way GPs think about demedicalization on a macro level and the way they act on a micro level. Elaborating on Parsons’(1951) classical concept of the sick role, this study introduces the term semilegitimized sick role to clarify this paradox. The third type, “the societal GP”, appears to be the most able to show a more multifactorial view on complaints of sadness. Therefore, this type connects the most to a course of de-medicalization.
Original languageEnglish
Article number765814
JournalFrontiers in Sociology
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • general practitioner
  • depression
  • sick role
  • young adult
  • medicalisation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sick or Sad? A Qualitative Study on How Dutch GPs Deal With Sadness Complaints Among Young Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this