TY - JOUR
T1 - Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives
AU - Bauer, Nico
AU - Calvin, Katherine
AU - Emmerling, Johannes
AU - Fricko, Oliver
AU - Fujimori, Shinichiro
AU - Hilaire, Jérôme
AU - Eom, Jiyong
AU - Krey, Volker
AU - Kriegler, Elmar
AU - Mouratiadou, Ioanna
AU - Sytze de Boer, Harmen
AU - van den Berg, Maarten
AU - Carrara, Samuel
AU - Daioglou, Vassilis
AU - Drouet, Laurent
AU - Edmonds, James E.
AU - Gernaat, David
AU - Havlik, Petr
AU - Johnson, Nils
AU - Klein, David
AU - Kyle, Page
AU - Marangoni, Giacomo
AU - Masui, Toshihiko
AU - Pietzcker, Robert C.
AU - Strubegger, Manfred
AU - Wise, Marshall
AU - Riahi, Keywan
AU - van Vuuren, Detlef P.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - Abstract Energy is crucial for supporting basic human needs, development and well-being. The future evolution of the scale and character of the energy system will be fundamentally shaped by socioeconomic conditions and drivers, available energy resources, technologies of energy supply and transformation, and end-use energy demand. However, because energy-related activities are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other environmental and social externalities, energy system development will also be influenced by social acceptance and strategic policy choices. All of these uncertainties have important implications for many aspects of economic and environmental sustainability, and climate change in particular. In the Shared-Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) framework these uncertainties are structured into five narratives, arranged according to the challenges to climate change mitigation and adaptation. In this study we explore future energy sector developments across the five SSPs using Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), and we also provide summary output and analysis for selected scenarios of global emissions mitigation policies. The mitigation challenge strongly corresponds with global baseline energy sector growth over the 21st century, which varies between 40% and 230% depending on final energy consumer behavior, technological improvements, resource availability and policies. The future baseline CO2-emission range is even larger, as the most energy-intensive SSP also incorporates a comparatively high share of carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and vice versa. Inter-regional disparities in the SSPs are consistent with the underlying socioeconomic assumptions; these differences are particularly strong in the SSPs with large adaptation challenges, which have little inter-regional convergence in long-term income and final energy demand levels. The scenarios presented do not include feedbacks of climate change on energy sector development. The energy sector SSPs with and without emissions mitigation policies are introduced and analyzed here in order to contribute to future research in climate sciences, mitigation analysis, and studies on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.
AB - Abstract Energy is crucial for supporting basic human needs, development and well-being. The future evolution of the scale and character of the energy system will be fundamentally shaped by socioeconomic conditions and drivers, available energy resources, technologies of energy supply and transformation, and end-use energy demand. However, because energy-related activities are significant sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other environmental and social externalities, energy system development will also be influenced by social acceptance and strategic policy choices. All of these uncertainties have important implications for many aspects of economic and environmental sustainability, and climate change in particular. In the Shared-Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) framework these uncertainties are structured into five narratives, arranged according to the challenges to climate change mitigation and adaptation. In this study we explore future energy sector developments across the five SSPs using Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), and we also provide summary output and analysis for selected scenarios of global emissions mitigation policies. The mitigation challenge strongly corresponds with global baseline energy sector growth over the 21st century, which varies between 40% and 230% depending on final energy consumer behavior, technological improvements, resource availability and policies. The future baseline CO2-emission range is even larger, as the most energy-intensive SSP also incorporates a comparatively high share of carbon-intensive fossil fuels, and vice versa. Inter-regional disparities in the SSPs are consistent with the underlying socioeconomic assumptions; these differences are particularly strong in the SSPs with large adaptation challenges, which have little inter-regional convergence in long-term income and final energy demand levels. The scenarios presented do not include feedbacks of climate change on energy sector development. The energy sector SSPs with and without emissions mitigation policies are introduced and analyzed here in order to contribute to future research in climate sciences, mitigation analysis, and studies on impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.
KW - Energy demand
KW - Energy resources
KW - Energy supply
KW - Energy system
KW - Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)
KW - Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs)
KW - valorisation
U2 - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
DO - 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-3780
VL - 42
SP - 316
EP - 330
JO - Global Environmental Change
JF - Global Environmental Change
ER -