Shaming and Compliance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Naming and shaming offenders is often considered an effective strategy to improve compliance. Shaming exposes an offender to condemnation by a community of stakeholders. The threat of negative publicity, reputational damage and social disapproval is perceived as a sanction, and can in theory be more powerful than a formal legal sanction. This chapter asks to what extent naming and shaming can improve compliance. It takes stock of extant empirical evidence on the effect of shaming policies on regulatory compliance and identifies conditions for shaming to affect compliance. The complex relationship between ‘naming and shaming’ and compliance makes it difficult to predict and control the various effects of shaming sanctions. The chapter concludes that the unpredictability of effects makes ‘naming and shaming’ a risky tool for regulators. A theory about naming and shaming should differentiate among types of offender, shaming agent and social context.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
EditorsBenjamin van Rooij, Daniel Sokol
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter30
Pages438-450
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781108759458
ISBN (Print)9781108477123
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Publication series

NameCambridge Law Handbooks

Keywords

  • Compliance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shaming and Compliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this