TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensitivity to Experiencing Alcohol Hangovers
T2 - Reconsideration of the 0.11% Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Threshold for Having a Hangover
AU - Verster, Joris C
AU - Kruisselbrink, L Darren
AU - Slot, Karin A
AU - Anogeianaki, Aikaterini
AU - Adams, Sally
AU - Alford, Chris
AU - Arnoldy, Lizanne
AU - Ayre, Elisabeth
AU - Balikji, Stephanie
AU - Benson, Sarah
AU - Bruce, Gillian
AU - Devenney, Lydia E
AU - Frone, Michael R
AU - Gunn, Craig
AU - Heffernan, Thomas
AU - Hensel, Kai O
AU - Hogewoning, Anna
AU - Johnson, Sean J
AU - van Lawick van Pabst, Albertine E
AU - van de Loo, Aurora J A E
AU - Mackus, Marlou
AU - Merlo, Agnese
AU - Murphy, René J L
AU - Owen, Lauren
AU - Palmer, Emily O C
AU - van Rossum, Charmaine J I
AU - Scholey, Andrew
AU - Terpstra, Chantal
AU - Vatsalya, Vatsalya
AU - Vermeulen, Sterre A
AU - van Wijk, Michelle
AU - Stock, Ann-Kathrin
PY - 2020/1/9
Y1 - 2020/1/9
N2 - The 2010 Alcohol Hangover Research Group consensus paper defined a cutoff blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.11% as a toxicological threshold indicating that sufficient alcohol had been consumed to develop a hangover. The cutoff was based on previous research and applied mostly in studies comprising student samples. Previously, we showed that sensitivity to hangovers depends on (estimated) BAC during acute intoxication, with a greater percentage of drinkers reporting hangovers at higher BAC levels. However, a substantial number of participants also reported hangovers at comparatively lower BAC levels. This calls the suitability of the 0.11% threshold into question. Recent research has shown that subjective intoxication, i.e., the level of severity of reported drunkenness, and not BAC, is the most important determinant of hangover severity. Non-student samples often have a much lower alcohol intake compared to student samples, and overall BACs often remain below 0.11%. Despite these lower BACs, many non-student participants report having a hangover, especially when their subjective intoxication levels are high. This may be the case when alcohol consumption on the drinking occasion that results in a hangover significantly exceeds their "normal" drinking level, irrespective of whether they meet the 0.11% threshold in any of these conditions. Whereas consumers may have relative tolerance to the adverse effects at their "regular" drinking level, considerably higher alcohol intake-irrespective of the absolute amount-may consequentially result in a next-day hangover. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 0.11% threshold value as a criterion for having a hangover should be abandoned.
AB - The 2010 Alcohol Hangover Research Group consensus paper defined a cutoff blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.11% as a toxicological threshold indicating that sufficient alcohol had been consumed to develop a hangover. The cutoff was based on previous research and applied mostly in studies comprising student samples. Previously, we showed that sensitivity to hangovers depends on (estimated) BAC during acute intoxication, with a greater percentage of drinkers reporting hangovers at higher BAC levels. However, a substantial number of participants also reported hangovers at comparatively lower BAC levels. This calls the suitability of the 0.11% threshold into question. Recent research has shown that subjective intoxication, i.e., the level of severity of reported drunkenness, and not BAC, is the most important determinant of hangover severity. Non-student samples often have a much lower alcohol intake compared to student samples, and overall BACs often remain below 0.11%. Despite these lower BACs, many non-student participants report having a hangover, especially when their subjective intoxication levels are high. This may be the case when alcohol consumption on the drinking occasion that results in a hangover significantly exceeds their "normal" drinking level, irrespective of whether they meet the 0.11% threshold in any of these conditions. Whereas consumers may have relative tolerance to the adverse effects at their "regular" drinking level, considerably higher alcohol intake-irrespective of the absolute amount-may consequentially result in a next-day hangover. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 0.11% threshold value as a criterion for having a hangover should be abandoned.
KW - alcohol
KW - hangover
KW - sensitivity
KW - subjective intoxication
KW - blood alcohol concentration
U2 - 10.3390/jcm9010179
DO - 10.3390/jcm9010179
M3 - Article
C2 - 31936502
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 9
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 179
ER -