Abstract
Meandering rivers are abundant on Earth, from the largest rivers to the smallest tributaries. The classical view of meandering rivers is a sinuous planform with rounded bends, which grow and migrate until they are cut-off. However, many low-energy meandering rivers have planforms that are much more complex than this classical view due to the heterogeneity of their alluvium, and show relatively limited channel migration. Based on a detailed palaeogeographic study of the Dommel River in The Netherlands, it is inferred that low-energy meandering rivers may develop tortuous planforms with sharp bends, owing to self-formed deposits that increasingly constrain the channel mobility. This mechanism is corroborated by data from 47 meandering river reaches of varied scale from around the world, which show that erosion-resistant floodplain deposits are preserved in the river banks when the river energy is below a critical threshold. The term ‘self-constraining’ is proposed for low-energy rivers where an increase in bank stability over time results in progressive tortuous planforms and reduced mobility. A conceptual model, based on the dataset, shows that the increase in bank stability over time also increases the energy required to break out of the tendency to self-constrain. Self-constraining thereby enhances the resilience of the system to bank erosion, while an unexpected increase in bank erosion may occur if river energy exceeds the critical threshold. This study provides a novel explanation for the evolution of low-energy river planforms and dynamics, and provides new insights on their responses to climate changes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 648-669 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Depositional Record |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research is part of the research programme RiverCare, supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Dutch Foundation of Applied Water Research (STOWA), and is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs under grant number P12-14 (Perspective Programme). M.G. Kleinhans was also supported by NWO (grant Vici 016.140.316/13710). This manuscript has benefited greatly from reviews by one anonymous reviewer and the associate editor. We would like to thank Alice Versendaal and Erna Voskuilen for their help with the OSL laboratory analysis, Meike Schipper for the illustration design of Figure 12, Renathe Kamstra for her help in the field, Martin Gibling, Jelmer Nijp and Elizabeth Chamberlain for discussion on the concepts. We would also like to thank Staatsbosbeheer, Brabants Landschap and water board De Dommel for the access to and the insight knowledge of the field sites.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. The Depositional Record published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Sedimentologists.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
This research is part of the research programme RiverCare, supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Dutch Foundation of Applied Water Research (STOWA), and is partly funded by the Ministry of Economic Affairs under grant number P12-14 (Perspective Programme). M.G. Kleinhans was also supported by NWO (grant Vici 016.140.316/13710). This manuscript has benefited greatly from reviews by one anonymous reviewer and the associate editor. We would like to thank Alice Versendaal and Erna Voskuilen for their help with the OSL laboratory analysis, Meike Schipper for the illustration design of Figure 12, Renathe Kamstra for her help in the field, Martin Gibling, Jelmer Nijp and Elizabeth Chamberlain for discussion on the concepts. We would also like to thank Staatsbosbeheer, Brabants Landschap and water board De Dommel for the access to and the insight knowledge of the field sites.
Keywords
- fluvial morphology
- heterogeneous floodplain architecture
- Holocene
- river channel planform