@article{f56e75eaf9a342eabd39f91713286315,
title = "Seedborne Cercospora beticola Can Initiate Cercospora Leaf Spot from Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Fruit Tissue",
abstract = "Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) is a globally important disease of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola. Long-distance movement of C. beticola has been indirectly evidenced in recent population genetic studies, suggesting potential dispersal via seed. Commercial sugar beet {"}seed{"} consists of the reproductive fruit (true seed surrounded by maternal pericarp tissue) coated in artificial pellet material. In this study, we confirmed the presence of viable C. beticola in sugar beet fruit for 10 of 37 tested seed lots. All isolates harbored the G143A mutation associated with quinone outside inhibitor resistance, and 32 of 38 isolates had reduced demethylation inhibitor sensitivity (EC50 > 1 µg/ml). Planting of commercial sugar beet seed demonstrated the ability of seedborne inoculum to initiate CLS in sugar beet. C. beticola DNA was detected in DNA isolated from xylem sap, suggesting the vascular system is used to systemically colonize the host. We established nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing using the MinION platform to detect fungi in sugar beet fruit. Fungal sequences from 19 different genera were identified from 11 different sugar beet seed lots, but Fusarium, Alternaria, and Cercospora were consistently the three most dominant taxa, comprising an average of 93% relative read abundance over 11 seed lots. We also present evidence that C. beticola resides in the pericarp of sugar beet fruit rather than the true seed. The presence of seedborne inoculum should be considered when implementing integrated disease management strategies for CLS of sugar beet in the future.",
keywords = "etiology, fungal pathogens, microbiome",
author = "Rebecca Spanner and Jonathan Neubauer and Heick, {Thies M} and Grusak, {Michael A} and Olivia Hamilton and Viviana Rivera-Varas and {de Jonge}, Ronnie and Sarah Pethybridge and Webb, {Kimberley M} and Gerhard Leubner-Metzger and Secor, {Gary A} and Bolton, {Melvin D}",
note = "Funding Information: Funding: The Bolton laboratory is funded by USDA CRIS Project 3060-21000-044-00-D and grants from the Sugarbeet Research and Education Board of North Dakota and Minnesota and the Beet Sugar Development Foundation. The Pethy-bridge laboratory is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) Hatch project NYG-625424. Funding Information: The Bolton laboratory is funded by USDA CRIS Project 3060-21000-044-00-D and grants from the Sugarbeet Research and Education Board of North Dakota and Minnesota and the Beet Sugar Development Foundation. The Pethybridge laboratory is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA) Hatch project NYG-625424. We thank Linda Young and Mari Natwick for excellent technical assistance; Anne Lisbet Hansen and Desiree Bj€orresdotter from NBR Nordic Beet Research for providing material and expert advice during manuscript writing; and Sara Duke (U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service) for help with statistical analyses. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 American Phytopathological Society. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = may,
doi = "10.1094/PHYTO-03-21-0113-R",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "1016--1028",
journal = "Phytopathology",
issn = "0031-949X",
publisher = "American Phytopathological Society",
number = "5",
}