Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Security Assistance and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order

  • Øystein H Rolandsen
  • , Ursula C Schröder
  • , Simone Tholens*
  • , Niagalé Bagayoko
  • , Louis-Alexandre Berg
  • , Chiara De Franco
  • , Lauren M Gould
  • , Nicholas Marsh
  • , Louise W Moe
  • , William Reno
  • , Jack Watling
  • , Nina Wilén
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Peace Research Institute Oslo
  • University of Hamburg
  • John Cabot University ,
  • African Security Sector Network ,
  • Georgia State University
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Roskilde University
  • Northwestern University
  • Royal United Services Institute
  • Lund University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The crisis of the Liberal International Order (LIO) has intensified amid growing great-power competition, the war in Ukraine, and the erosion of multilateral institutions. This Forum examines security assistance (SA)—the training, equipping and support of external security actors—as a critical lens for understanding how this crisis is unfolding and how international order is increasingly contested in practice. The Forum consists of an introductory essay and nine contributions organized into three thematic sets. Collectively, the contributions move beyond viewing SA as either a technocratic instrument of governance reform or a mechanism of proxy warfare. Instead, they conceptualize SA as relational practices that shape political authority, strategic alignments and normative expectations across diverse contexts. The first set analyses SA as a foreign policy instrument, focusing on its political purposes, strategic logics and effectiveness in an era of intensified geopolitical rivalry. The second set examines the unintended and often destabilizing consequences of SA. The authors show how assistance can contribute to political-territorial fragmentation, militarized competition and the proliferation of violence, while frequently in tension with its stated objectives. The final set of contributions looks ahead, exploring why SA continues to expand despite persistent shortcomings and how it may evolve as the liberal foundations that historically underpinned Western-led assistance are increasingly contested. Taken together, the Forum demonstrates that SA is a central site of contestation within contemporary international politics. While commonly justified as a means of stabilization and order-building, SA often produces new forms of dependency, dissonance between intention and outcome, and competing visions of political order. As a growing number of states deploy SA to an expanding range of recipients, the Forum highlights the need for a relational understanding of SA that captures its simultaneous ordering and disordering effects in an era of multipolar competition.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberviag003
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date20 Mar 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

  • global ordering
  • liberal international order
  • security assistance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Security Assistance and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this