TY - JOUR
T1 - Scoping article: research frontiers on the governance of the Sustainable Development Goals
AU - Hickmann, Thomas
AU - Biermann, Frank
AU - Senit, Carole-Anne
AU - Sun, Yixian
AU - Bexell, Magdalena
AU - Bolton, Mitzi
AU - Bornemann, Basil
AU - Censoro, Jecel
AU - Charles, Aurelie
AU - Coy, Dominique
AU - Dahlmann, Frederik
AU - Elder, Mark
AU - Fritzsche, Felicitas
AU - Gehre Galvao, Thiago
AU - Grainger-Brown, Jarrod
AU - Inoue, Cristina Yumie Aoki
AU - Jonsson, Kristina
AU - Koloffon Rosas, Montserrat
AU - Krellenberg, Kerstin
AU - Moallemi, Enayat A
AU - Alva, Ivonne Lobos
AU - Malekpour, Shirin
AU - Ningrum, Dianty
AU - Paneva, Aneliya
AU - Partzsch, Lena
AU - Ramiro, Rodrigo
AU - Raven, Rob
AU - Szedlascek, Eszter
AU - Thompson, John
AU - van Driel, Melanie
AU - Viani Damasceno, Jéssica
AU - Webb, Robert
AU - Weiland, Sabine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Non-Technical Summary This article takes stock of the 2030 Agenda and focuses on five governance areas. In a nutshell, we see a quite patchy and often primarily symbolic uptake of the global goals. Although some studies highlight individual success stories of actors and institutions to implement the goals, it remains unclear how such cases can be upscaled and develop a broader political impact to accelerate the global endeavor to achieve sustainable development. We hence raise concerns about the overall effectiveness of governance by goal-setting and raise the question of how we can make this mode of governance more effective. Technical Summary A recent meta-analysis on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has shown that these global goals are moving political processes forward only incrementally, with much variation across countries, sectors, and governance levels. Consequently, the realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development remains uncertain. Against this backdrop, this article explores where and how incremental political changes are taking place due to the SDGs, and under what conditions these developments can bolster sustainability transformations up to 2030 and beyond. Our scoping review builds upon an online expert survey directed at the scholarly community of the 'Earth System Governance Project' and structured dialogues within the 'Taskforce on the SDGs' under this project. We identified five governance areas where some effects of the SDGs have been observable: (1) global governance, (2) national policy integration, (3) subnational initiatives, (4) private governance, and (5) education and learning for sustainable development. This article delves deeper into these governance areas and draws lessons to guide empirical research on the promises and pitfalls of accelerating SDG implementation. Social Media Summary As SDG implementation lags behind, this article explores 5 governance areas asking how to strengthen the global goals.
AB - Non-Technical Summary This article takes stock of the 2030 Agenda and focuses on five governance areas. In a nutshell, we see a quite patchy and often primarily symbolic uptake of the global goals. Although some studies highlight individual success stories of actors and institutions to implement the goals, it remains unclear how such cases can be upscaled and develop a broader political impact to accelerate the global endeavor to achieve sustainable development. We hence raise concerns about the overall effectiveness of governance by goal-setting and raise the question of how we can make this mode of governance more effective. Technical Summary A recent meta-analysis on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has shown that these global goals are moving political processes forward only incrementally, with much variation across countries, sectors, and governance levels. Consequently, the realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development remains uncertain. Against this backdrop, this article explores where and how incremental political changes are taking place due to the SDGs, and under what conditions these developments can bolster sustainability transformations up to 2030 and beyond. Our scoping review builds upon an online expert survey directed at the scholarly community of the 'Earth System Governance Project' and structured dialogues within the 'Taskforce on the SDGs' under this project. We identified five governance areas where some effects of the SDGs have been observable: (1) global governance, (2) national policy integration, (3) subnational initiatives, (4) private governance, and (5) education and learning for sustainable development. This article delves deeper into these governance areas and draws lessons to guide empirical research on the promises and pitfalls of accelerating SDG implementation. Social Media Summary As SDG implementation lags behind, this article explores 5 governance areas asking how to strengthen the global goals.
KW - 2030 Agenda
KW - Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
KW - United Nations
KW - goal-setting
KW - governance
KW - implementation
KW - policies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183786335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/sus.2024.4
DO - 10.1017/sus.2024.4
M3 - Review article
SN - 2059-4798
VL - 7
JO - Global Sustainability
JF - Global Sustainability
M1 - e7
ER -